Legal Opinion

Brannon v. Pike

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1987No. 16396Published

1Opinion of the Court

737 P.2d 459 (1987)

112 Idaho 938

Charles BRANNON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Emil F. PIKE, Jr., Defendant-Respondent, and

Idaho Special Indemnity Fund, Defendant.

No. 16396.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

April 9, 1987.

Patricia D. Gaw, Wendell, for plaintiff-appellant.

John W. Barrett and Thomas V. Munson, Boise, for defendant-respondent.

HUNTLEY, Justice.

This appeal presents the issue of whether the Idaho Industrial Commission or the district court has jurisdiction to hear a claim by a client against his attorney for alleged breach of contract of representation in a workers' compensation claim.

Subsequent to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Greene v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. LittkyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. State v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Heese v. a & T TRUCKINGIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hancock v. HallidayIdaho Supreme Court · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API