Legal Opinion

Van Vorst v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 31, 2008No. 08-130 TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, Judge.

Before the court are the following motions: (1) Defendant’s Motion for More Definite Statement; (2) Defendant’s Motion to Stay Proceedings; (3) Plaintiffs August 13, 2008 Motion for Supplemental Pleadings; (4) Plaintiffs August 13, 2008 Motion to Add a Refund Claim for Year 2007; (5) Plaintiffs September 23, 2008 Motion for Supplemental Pleadings; and (6) Plaintiffs October 30, 2008 Motions for Injunctive Relief and Award of Legal Cost[s]. In its September 23, 2008 order, the court deferred ruling upon plaintiffs September 23, 2008 motion for supplemental pleadings “[bjecause…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henry E. & Nancy Horton Bartels Trust ex rel. Cornell University v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Campbell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  3. Clearmeadow Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API