Legal Opinion
People v. Brock
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 13, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s request to file a late notice of alibi. Defendant did not give a reasonable explanation for failing to *1009comply with CPL 250.20 (1) and waiting until the day of jury selection to inform the People of alibi witnesses (see, People v Watson, 269 AD2d 755, lv denied 95 NY2d 806; People v Millio, 226 AD2d 1071, lv denied 88 NY2d 990; People v Bernard, 210 AD2d 419, lv denied 85 NY2d 906). The court also did not abuse its discretion by its Sandoval ruling. The fact that the prior crime was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. PavaoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. AbrewNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. LarabyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. GreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. AngonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- ANGONA, MATTHEW J., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. AngonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014