Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Campbell

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1981No. 80CA0565Published

1DissentKelly, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The majority states that it was the action of Colorado and South Dakota that resulted in the surety’s failure to surrender the defendant. I disagree.

The method for surrendering a defendant by a surety is clearly set forth in § 16-4-108, C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8). The defendant may be surrendered at any time, even while the defendant is in custody on another offense. People v. Jaramillo, 163 Colo. 39, 428 P.2d 67 (1967). Here, the surety could have exonerated itself by surrendering the defendant while he was in custody in South Dakota. This could have been done by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. JaramilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  2. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. People v. LoomisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  4. Union Benefit Fire Insurance v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API