State Land Board v. State Department of Fish & Game
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mcdonougi-i, justice.
The question here presented is whether the language “reserving to the State of Utah, all coal and other minerals, in * * * [certain lands] * * * ” retains for the State sand and gravel in said lands as contended by the plaintiff. From a judgment so holding the defendant appeals, contending that it owns the land here in question in fee and absolutely, including the sand and gravel therein.
It is not disputed that the defendant Fish and Game Department acquired and owns in fee, subj ect to the above reservation, the land in question, being Section 32, Township 3 South, Range…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holloway Gravel Co. v. McKowenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Heathman v. GilesUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- W. S. Hatch Co. v. Public Service Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Farrell v. SayreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Andrus v. AllredUtah Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Carrier v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Associated General Contractors v. Board of Oil, Gas & MiningUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Norken Corp. v. McGahanAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Salt Lake City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Spurlock v. Santa Fe Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.