Legal Opinion

Satizabal v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 26, 2023No. 3:22-cv-01229Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ROBINSON AGUIRRE SATIZABAL, CASE NO. 20CR0440-LAB 12 Petitioner, 13 vs. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 14 SET ASIDE SENTENCE UNDER 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

28 U.S.C. § 2255

Respondent. 16 17 18 Robinson Aguirre Satizabal moves to vacate or set aside his sentence 19 under 28 U.S.C § 2255. (Dkt. 97). The Government opposes Satizabal’s 20 motion. (Dkt. 103). Having carefully considered the pleadings in this action, the 21 Court DENIES the motion. 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 On July 28, 2020, Satizabal plead guilty to two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Marcus T. Baumann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Michael Leslie BlaylockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Brian David Frye v. R. Hickman, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Rodolfo Espinoza Abarca, United States of America v. Espinoza Rodolfo AbarcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API