Legal Opinion

G.L. v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 9, 1988No. A8309-05835; CA A40470PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiff was sexually assaulted by an employe of defendant while she was a patient at a hospital which it operates. She contended that defendant impliedly “contracted to provide adequate care, safety, treatment and security for [her] while she was an inpatient,” that defendant is strictly liable for its employe’s intentional tort and that defendant was negligent, in that it knew or should have known of the employe’s propensities and failed to take protective action. The trial court struck the implied contract and strict liability claims, apparently on the ground that, as a matter of law,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Cain v. RijkenOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hungerford v. Portland Sanitarium & Benevolent Ass'n.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Torres v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. G. L. v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Maguire v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Maguire v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API