Legal Opinion

Enyeart v. Borgeson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1962No. 35940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, appeal from an order granting a new trial in their action to recover damages for personal injuries to the plaintiff wife from an automobile accident.

The accident occurred on a three lane highway, with one lane restricted to northbound traffic and two lanes for southbound traffic. Between the northbound and the two southbound lanes, there are three painted lines, one white and two yellow, one yellow stripe on each side of the white one. Both cars were northbound.

Plaintiff’s version of the occurrence was that she signaled for a left turn at approximately one-half…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adkisson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Sandberg v. SpoelstraWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Johnson v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Profitt v. JG Watts Construction CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Curtis v. BlacklawWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Mendenhall v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  3. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Madill v. Los Angeles Seattle Motor Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Wick v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API