Legal Opinion

Candreva v. Village of Ossining

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1961Published

1Opinion of the CourtFrank S. McCullough, J.

This is a motion by the defendant the Village of Ossining to dismiss the complaint against it, pursuant to rule 106 of the Eules of Civil Practice on the ground that the complaint does not set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint alleges that the infant plaintiff was a'passenger in an automobile owned and operated by the individual defendant, while said vehicle was proceeding in an easterly direction on Croton Avenue, in the Village of Ossining. Said infant allegedly sustained certain injuries as a result of the vehicle striking a pole.

The Village of Ossining…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Village of OssiningNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Rox v. Village of Great NeckNew York District Court · 1959
  3. Hinch v. Frankel's Fabric CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API