Legal Opinion

Eustace v. Metropolitan Savings Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 9, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lloyd, J.

The action was to recover the sum of $3,000 paid on account of a contract to purchase a tract of land in Gloucester county, together with $600 paid by the plaintiff for search fees and examination of the title. The case was hoard by the judge sitting without a jury, and upon the conclusion of the proofs there was a finding for the defendant. From the judgment rendered on this finding the present appeal is taken.

The essential parts of the agreement of sale entered into by the parties were that the vendor would convey in fee-simple by a special…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brinn v. Mennen Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Vandermade v. AppertNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API