Legal Opinion

Derrick, Inc. v. Quigless

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 2013No. ED 99257PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Judge.

Kirk and Marsha Quigless (“Homeowners”) appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Derrick, Inc. (“Contractor”). Homeowners contend the trial court erred in entering judgment against them because the judgment was in violation of due process and void in that they did not receive notice of the trial setting. We affirm.

Contractor is a Missouri corporation in the business of supplying labor and materials for residential construction and remodeling. Homeowners are married individuals residing in St. Louis, Missouri.

Contractor and Homeowners entered into a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brooks v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Kerth v. Polestar EntertainmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. McDaniel v. LovelaceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Breckenridge Material Co. v. EnloeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Reeves v. Allstate Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. Louis Police Leadership Organization v. St. Louis Board of Police CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Magellanic Seven, LLC v. Wentzville Church of GodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. The St. Louis Police Leadership Organization v. St. Louis Board of Police CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API