Legal Opinion

Pape v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 18, 1963PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

This case comes to us on a reservation from the Superior Court, based on stipulated facts, seeking an answer to the question whether a certain transfer in trust is subject to a succession tax, under § 12-341 (d) of the General Statutes, a& a transfer intended to take effect in possession or enjoyment at or after the death of the transferor.

On December 27, 1937, the decedent, William JPape, of Woodbury, hereinafter called the donor,, transferred to two of his sons, an attorney and himself, as trustees, certain personal property under an irrevocable trust agreement. The trust agreement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. BlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Blodgett v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Dolak v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  4. Bryant v. HackettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Hackett v. Bankers Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tax Commissioner v. Estate of BissellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Naylor v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  3. Archibald v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  4. Bunting v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  5. Heffernan v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API