In Re Apportionment of State Legislature—1964
Michigan Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceO’Hara, J.
I concur in major substance with the carefully considered opinion of Mr. Justice Dethmers and for the reasons he has therein assigned. Specifically: I reject the Austin-Kleiner plan as *447being violative' of the plain mandate in article 4 to ■apportion and district in accordance with the terms ■of that article. I reject the Brown plan as over-weighing the maintenance of existing senatorial -districts. I reject the contention that the upper and lower peninsulas are contiguous by land within the meaning of the 1963 Constitution. I do not consider Scholle v. Secretary of State, 367 Mich 176, as…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.