Legal Opinion
Spooner v. EEN, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 28, 2010No. 08-cv-262-P-SPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON AMENDED MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Jason Spooner’s Amended Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (Docket # 124). As explained herein, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART.
*5I. INTRODUCTION
This Court has already found Plaintiff was entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees in connection with its Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law, which stated in relevant part:
Under the Copyright Act, the Court may “award a reasonable attorney’s fee to the prevailing party as part of the costs.” 17 U.S.C. § 505. “The goal of such awards is to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lloyd Lieb, Trading as Specialized Cassettes v. Topstone Industries, Inc., and D. Robbins & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Annabelle Lipsett v. Gumersindo BlancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Torres-Rivera v. O'Neill-CancelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- De Jesus Nazario v. Morris RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spooner v. EEN, INC.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Cushing v. McKeeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2012