Legal Opinion

Rasher-Kingman-Herrin Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1919No. 14935Published

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered March 4, 1918, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for damages, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action was to recover damages which resulted from a mistake in the transmission of an unrepeated night lettergram. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in *544findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment sustaining the plaintiff’s right to recover in the sum of six hundred dollars. From this judgment, the defendant appeals.

As the case is controlled by a question of law, the facts will only be briefly stated. The respondent, Rasher-Kingman-Herrin Company, a corporation, was engaged in business in the city of Spokane, this state. One A. W. Taylor…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Bank of SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Durre v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API