Legal Opinion
Polite v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 6, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Petitioner contends that he was denied adequate employee assistance and that he was improperly denied the right to call certain witnesses. However, the only objections petitioner made at the hearing were with respect to the denial of witnesses he requested to testify regarding the incident leading to the threats charge. Likewise, petitioner’s claim of inadequate assistance is directed solely to the assistance as it pertained to the threats charge. Inasmuch as that charge was dismissed upon administrative appeal, petitioner’s claims with respect to such are moot (see Matter of May v Selsky,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- May v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Carter v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Tafari v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bunting v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Davis v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Austin v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Hayes v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Garcia v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.