Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Redding v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 21, 1997No. A96A1740, A96A1741 and A96A1742Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBlackburn, Judge

I concur in the judgment only as reached by the majority in Division 1; however, I must respectfully dissent to the majority’s holding in Division 2 and to its judgment affirming the trial court.

*657With respect to Division 1 of the majority, I agree that this case was properly brought as a direct appeal. A discharge in bankruptcy is an affirmative defense and proof of such defense constitutes “a bar to recovery and not merely the abatement of an action.” City of Atlanta v. Chambers, 205 Ga. App. 834, 835 (1) (424 SE2d 19) (1992).

The trial court and the parties dealt with the subject motion as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. Bonner v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Jones v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Robertson v. U-Haul Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API