Mutual Benefit Insurance v. Goschenhoppen Mutual Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge.
The issue is whether the seller’s property insurer may recover a pro rata contribution from the buyer’s property insurer where the insured real estate was damaged by fire after the signing of the agreement of sale but prior to settlement and where the agreement places the risk of loss *366on the seller. We find that the seller’s insurer is entitled to recover and affirm.
Buyer’s insurer, Goschenhoppen Mutual Insurance Company, (“Goschenhoppen”), appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of seller’s insurer, appellee Mutual Benefit Insurance Company (“Mutual Benefit”). The facts…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dubin Paper Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- United National Insurance v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Lawrence B. And Harriet F. Vogel v. Northern Assurance Company, Limited, and Mount Joy Mutual Insurance Company (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Young v. Eastern Engineering & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. LaceySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lucas v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Kempf v. ST. PAUL REINSURANCE CO. LIMITEDIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- MUT. BEN. INS. CO. v. Goschenhoppen Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- AIG Centennial Insurance Company v. J. Brian O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Everett Cash Mutual Insurance v. General Accident Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.