In re LoChiatto
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
In this appeal appellants’ principal contention is that they were entitled to additional discovery, beyond that authorized in In re LoChiatto, 497 F.2d 803, (1st Cir. 1974), because a portion of a *435government affidavit indicates alleged failure to minimize use of wiretaps by the government. This contention is frivolous. The brief conversation about dinner relied upon by appellants, which came in the midst of other intercepted conversations relating to apparent criminal activities, in no meaningful way suggests a failure to minimize. The remaining issues raised by appellants are also without…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Barbara Lochiatto, in Re Patrick Lochiatto, in Re John E. DunnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- In Re Arthur MarcusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975