Legal Opinion

Bank v. . Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case was heard below upon facts agreed, as follows:

1. Both plaintiff and defendant Scotland Neck Bank are, and were at the time of the acts hereinafter set out, corporations of this State, doing a general banking business.

2. On 1 November, 1904, S.W. Morrisett and J. G. Morrisett, partners as Morrisett Bros., gave their note to defendant Scotland Neck Bank for $1,500, for borrowed money, and to secure the same, S.W. Morrisett and wife executed to the said Scotland Neck (240) Bank a mortgage on real estate in the town of Scotland Neck, N.C. which was duly recorded.

3. Some time after the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Wilkins, Neely & Jones v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Fievel v. ZuberTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Sanford v. McLeanNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  4. Cheesebrough v. MillardNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  5. Gans v. . ThiemeNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Ass'n v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. French v. Grand Beach Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. M. & J. Finance Corp. v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Christopher v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Holland v. . DulinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API