Legal Opinion

State v. Lanning

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 25, 1996No. 74,458PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

Pursuant to K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 38-1602(b)(3), defendant was prosecuted as an adult based upon a prior juvenile adjudication. On appeal, defendant claims the use of K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 38-1602(b)(3) to prosecute him as an adult and the district court’s inclusion of his prior felony level juvenile adjudication in scoring his criminal history classification enhanced the severity level or applicable penalties and violates K.S.A. 21-4710(d)(ll).

This is an issue of first impression which requires us to interpret the effect of K.S.A. 1994 Supp.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DonlaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. City of Wichita v. 200 South Broadway, Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. State v. SchleinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. State v. LaMunyonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  5. State v. JC Sports Bar, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. CLINT L.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
  4. State v. Perez-MoranSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. State v. FultzCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API