Commonwealth v. Jenkins
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction under The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act.
C. Patrick Murray, a narcotics agent, testified that, while standing on a street corner, he observed Ernest Welch, an informant who worked with the Williamsport Police and was accompanying Murray that day, conversing with someone in appellant’s car. The informant left appellant’s car and went to talk to Agent Murray. Agent Murray asked the informant to make a deal for fifteen bags of narcotics at ten dollars a bag. The informant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Albert Lopez Gallego v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Commonwealth v. TownsendSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FelicianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. BensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. RickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. GardnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.