Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Bowers

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1957No. File 9604Published

1DissentRoberts, J.

I cannot agree with the conclusion of the majority that the order granting a new trial should be reversed. The rule is an elementary one that the power to grant a new trial does not rest upon statute, but is inherent in the trial court except as limited by statute. 39 AmJur., New Trials, § 4; Larsen v. Johnson, 43 S.D. 223, 178 N.W. 876; Houck v. Hult, 58 S.D. 181, 235 N.W. 512. Statutes regulating new trials will not be construed to abridge the inherent power of the court when they *132manifest no intention to do so, but merely to regulate the rights of parties litigant. Annotation: 48 A.L.R.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Larsen v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Purinton v. PurintonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Houck v. HultSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. LashSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API