Wright v. Colville Tribal Enterprise Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
1Dissent
¶40 (dissenting) — The majority commits several errors in deciding this case which leads to an erroneous conclusion. The trial court decision dismissed the complaint pursuant to a CR 12(b)(1) motion, concluding it lacked subject matter jurisdiction.10 The Court of Appeals *128reversed that decision, and petitioners did not challenge that issue here.11 To the extent this case presents an issue involving tribal immunity, the factual record is insufficient for an appellate court to make this determination. This case should be remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
C. Johnson, J.
*128¶41 The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Dixon v. Picopa Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Ransom v. St. Regis Mohawk Education & Community Fund, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Berge v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.