Legal Opinion

Rielly v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, "William Rosenberg and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term, and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 27th day of November, 1900, vacating an ex parte order requiring the plaintiff to give security for costs.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J".:

The plaintiff, trustee in bankruptcy of Rosenberg & Krause, brought this action against the bankrupts and three other persons, seeking to set aside and have declared void various assignments and transfers of goods, wares and merchandise, book accounts, bills receivable and other instruments for the payinent of money. He claimed that some of such transfers or assignments were made to each of the defendants, other than the bankrupts, and specific allegations of the nature of the assignments and transfers and the time at which they were made are contained in the complaint. All of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Veeder v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Joseph v. RaffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. Kelley v. KremerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Schreier v. HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Allen v. McCormickNew York Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Riker v. GwynneNew York Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API