Legal Opinion

McElfresh v. MacCabees

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1930No. 6749PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge :

In the jmar 1894, Joseph McElfresh, aged 48 years, obtained a life insurance policy of $3,000.00 from the Maccabees, a fraternal and beneficial order. The initial premium was $2.70 a month, but the policy was subject, by express agreement, to the laws of the order then in force or thereafter adopted. The premium was raised in 1901 to $3.60 a month, and again in 1904, when the insurer proposed an increase to $7.20 a month under what it termed a “Whole Life Plan”. This proposal was accepted by McElfresh, who waived certain benefits to obtain the rate. What Judge Tucker said of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Supreme Council of the Royal ArcanumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. MimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Abell v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Jenkins v. TalbotIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Wineland v. Knights of the Maccabees of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bollenback v. Continental Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Harless v. Western & Southern Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Shultz v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API