Lozinak v. Board of Education
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and petition dismissed. We cannot say that “the penalty of [termination] . . . shocks the judicial conscience” (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 40 [2001]; see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 234-235 [1974]).
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kelly v. SafirNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
3Cited by65 opinions
- Bolt v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
- People v. GoldstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. MouldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. Marquis A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.