Legal Opinion

Lozinak v. Board of Education

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 2014PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and petition dismissed. We cannot say that “the penalty of [termination] . . . shocks the judicial conscience” (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 40 [2001]; see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 234-235 [1974]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. SafirNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Bolt v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
  2. People v. GoldstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. MouldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. People v. Marquis A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API