Legal Opinion

Burchinell v. Hirsh

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1895Published

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, P. J.

This replevin suit grew out of a dispute between the vendors and attaching creditors of a bankrupt merchant. During 1891, David Cohen was dealing in ready-made clothing and its usual accessories in the city of Denver. In the latter part of that year, some of the employees of-the commercial agencies of Dun & Co., and Bradstreet & Co., obtained from Cohen information respecting his financial affairs. About the same time he transmitted to Benjamin & Co-, of New York, a statement of. his assets. In April, 1892, the appellees, Hirsh, Elson & Co., through their traveling salesman, sold Cohen a bill…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zucker v. KarpelesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hotchkin v. Third National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Gainesville National Bank v. Bamberger, Bloom & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Garbutt v. Bank of Prairie du ChienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Morrill v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API