Legal Opinion

D'Amelio v. Morgan Goodwill Industries

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided October 7, 2002No. 992642Published

1Opinion of the Court

Billings, A.J.

After hearing, and after careful consideration of the parties’ written submissions, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED.

A. Facts

Plaintiff, who is blind and mildly retarded, was a “consumer” (client) of a vocational training program administered by the defendant (herein, “Morgan”) under contract with the Department of Mental Retardation. She worked at Morgan’s facility at 1010 Harrison Avenue, Boston, hanging clothes (apparently in connection with Morgan’s used clothing business). In its DMR contract, Morgan agreed to provide “[a] comprehensive vocational…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mullins v. Pine Manor CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Flood v. Southland Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Foster v. the Loft, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  5. Atlas Tack Corp. v. DonabedMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API