Legal Opinion

In re Capital One Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided December 10, 2012No. MDL No. 2416PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, common defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (Capital One) moves to centralize this litigation in the Northern District of Illinois. The litigation encompasses the 31 actions listed on Schedule A.1

*1367Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC, which is a defendant in the Northern District of Illinois Martin action, supports centralization in the Northern District of Illinois. All responding plaintiffs (plaintiffs in 30 of the 31 actions), however, oppose centralization. If the Panel nevertheless orders…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Evergreen Valley Project LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
  2. In Re Zimmer Durom Hip Cup Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
  3. In re Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Telephone Consumer Protection Act LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Generic Digoxin & Doxycycline Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017
  2. In re Monitronics International, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API