Legal Opinion
Laperla, Ltd. v. Peerless Insurance
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 6, 2009No. File HHD-CV-05-4015463PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBentivegna, J.
I
STATEMENT OF CASE
This case involves an insurance coverage dispute. In the revised two count complaint, dated April 11, 2007, the plaintiff, LaPerla, Ltd., alleges that the defendant, Peerless Insurance Company, breached the insurance contract and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by failing to pay a loss claim under the “jewelers block coverage” provision of the policy.
On July 19, 2007, the defendant filed an answer and special defenses. In addition to denying the claims made by the plaintiff, the defendant has affirmatively asserted six special defenses: (1) collateral…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Ramirez v. Health Net of the Northeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Cross v. HuttenlocherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schmidt v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- Canfield Motor Sports, Inc. v. Motorist Mut. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017