Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lickliter v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 2004No. 2002-SC-0487-MRPublished

1DissentStumbo, Justice

I dissent from the majority opinion because I believe that Appellant was entitled to an insanity instruction due to his mental condition resulting from the chronic abuse of methamphetamine.

In Commonwealth v. Tate, Ky., 893 S.W.2d 368, 369 (1995), this Court held that drug addiction, by itself, did not constitute a mental illness for the purpose of pleading an insanity defense pursuant to KRS 504.020. Tate dealt with a defendant who committed robbery in order to obtain money for drugs so as to avoid the pain of withdrawal symptoms. The Tate court did not hold that the mental effects of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ragland v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. TateKentucky Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API