Pinner v. Pinner
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Randy R. Pinner v. Mona H. Pinner, et al., No. 16, September Term, 2019, Opinion by Booth, J. COURTS – PERSONAL JURISDICTION – SPECIFIC JURISDICTION – CONSENT TO BE SUED – The filing and prosecution in Maryland of a single toxic tort suit by a North Carolina resident and her late husband was not purposeful availment in the forum state that amounted to consent to be sued there. COURTS – PERSONAL JURISDICTION – SPECIFIC JURISDICTION – CONSTITUTIONAL REASONABLENESS – It was not constitutionally reasonable for a Maryland court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a North Carolina resident based…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- A.B. v. YMCA Camp Tockwogh, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- Beltway Paving Company, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Bridget Akintayo v. United Airlines Inc. et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- Collard v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Latia Thompson-McKoy v. Todd A. Kelting, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.