Legal Opinion

Pinner v. Pinner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 3, 2020No. 16/19PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Randy R. Pinner v. Mona H. Pinner, et al., No. 16, September Term, 2019, Opinion by Booth, J. COURTS – PERSONAL JURISDICTION – SPECIFIC JURISDICTION – CONSENT TO BE SUED – The filing and prosecution in Maryland of a single toxic tort suit by a North Carolina resident and her late husband was not purposeful availment in the forum state that amounted to consent to be sued there. COURTS – PERSONAL JURISDICTION – SPECIFIC JURISDICTION – CONSTITUTIONAL REASONABLENESS – It was not constitutionally reasonable for a Maryland court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a North Carolina resident based…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. A.B. v. YMCA Camp Tockwogh, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
  2. Beltway Paving Company, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
  3. Bridget Akintayo v. United Airlines Inc. et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
  4. Collard v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  5. Latia Thompson-McKoy v. Todd A. Kelting, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API