Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hadley v. Illinois Department of Corrections

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2007No. 101979PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitzgerald

Justices Freeman, Kilbride, Garman, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Karmeier dissented, with opinion, joined by Chief Justice Thomas.

OPINION

Plaintiff, Willie B. Hadley, an inmate at Big Muddy River Correctional Center, filed a class action complaint in the circuit court of Sangamon County, seeking to enjoin defendant, the Illinois Department of Corrections (DOC or the Department), from charging him and other allegedly indigent inmates a $2 co-payment for nonemergency medical and dental services. See 730 ILCS 5/3— 6 — 2(f) (West 2004). The circuit court granted DOC’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Reynolds v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Beahringer v. PageIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Illinois Consolidated Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Kean v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ready v. United/Goedecke Services, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Davis v. DysonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. Fox v. SeidenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. Tenny v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API