Freeman v. Withers
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
This is an action to recover a claim for wages. The jury found for plaintiff. A motion for new trial was denied and the appeal is from the judgment.
The first question presented is whether the complaint is sufficient. It alleges that plaintiff entered the service of defendant at his instance and request as an oil-well driller on certain described property at the agreed and reasonable compensation of $10 a day; that plaintiff worked for fifty-four days; and that the total value and agreed compensation earned is the sum of $540, only $35 of which has been paid.
In considering whether the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Heckaman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
- Wilcox v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Doane v. MarquiseeMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Awbery v. SchmidtMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Wibaux Realty Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Associated Mgmt. Servs., Inc. v. RuffMontana Supreme Court · 2018
- Butler Manufacturing Co. v. J & L IMPLEMENT CO.Montana Supreme Court · 1975
- Audit Services, Inc. v. Elmo Road Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
- Heck Calkins v. Oxbow Ranch, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1972
- Hamilton v. Lion Head Ski Lift, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.