Legal Opinion

Bates v. . Holbrook

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to amend remittitur.

1Opinion of the CourtBartlett, J.

An application having been made to us for an order to show cause why the remittitur in this action should not be recalled and amended, the application is denied as being unnecessary. The order of the Appellate Division granting a new trial having being affirmed by this court, under the statute and the stipulation made by the defendants, the plaintiff is entitled to judgment absolute. But the character of that judgment is not necessarily determined nor has it been determined in this case. Whether it will grant an injunction requiring the immediate removal of the defendants’ plant and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Couts v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. In re MartinezNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
  3. Gorden v. GordenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API