Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Perkins v. Hardwick

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 26, 1936No. 33,097PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This is an original proceeding in quo warranto.

Omitting formal allegations, the petition states that the board of county commissioners of Morton county on March 2, 1936, adopted the resolution hereafter referred to, and entered upon lands in an attempt to stop soil drifting, assessed charges for such services and entered the charges on the tax rolls of the county; that the board issued warrants for the services performed to be paid from the soil-drifting fund to be derived from taxes collected upon each piece of land upon which the board…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Comm'rs of Leavenworth Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Board of Commissioners v. AbbottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  3. City of Hutchinson v. LeimbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Wulf v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Balch v. GlennSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Muench v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State ex rel. Donaldson v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Hunt v. EddySupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. State Ex Rel. Hawks v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Lemons v. NollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API