Legal Opinion · Dissent

Loeschigk v. . Bridge

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1870Published

Appeal from a judgment entered upon the decision of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial district, affirming the judgment dismissing the complaint, with costs, rendered on trial before Mr. Justice Leonard without a jury.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment entered upon the decision of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial district, affirming the judgment dismissing the complaint, with costs, rendered on trial before Mr. Justice Leonard without a jury. The appellants, having recovered judgment against the respondent Bridge, July 13, 1861, for $3,501.39, upon which execution was returned unsatisfied, brought this action to set aside a sale made by Bridge to Burdick, and certain judgments recovered against Bridge by Burdick, as fraudulent. On the trial the justice found as follows: “ That the plaintiffs…

1Dissent

Sutherland, J. (dissenting.)

This action was brought by the plaintiffs as judgment creditors of the defendant, Bridge, with an execution returned nulla Iona, to set aside certain transfers of property by the defendant, Bridge, to the defendant, Burdick, and certain judgments suffered and confessed by Bridge in favor of Burdick.

For some years previous to the sale transactions on or about tiie 24th of April, between the two defendants, hereafter specified, Bridge had been, and then was, a merchant, dealing in hats, caps, millinery and straw goods and Yankee notions, at 359 Broadway, in the city…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dunham v. . WatermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Nicholson v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  3. Downing v. KellyNew York Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Scheitlin v. StoneNew York Supreme Court · 1865

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API