People v. Vera
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the Court
RAPHAEL J.
*1083Defendant and appellant Esteban Vera was convicted of possessing one kilogram of a controlled substance that was discovered through a dog sniff during a traffic stop of his vehicle. An officer had stopped Vera due to a tinted-window infraction. We must determine whether the dog sniff unconstitutionally prolonged his detention for that traffic stop, requiring *1084suppression of the drugs under Rodriguez v. United States (2015) --- U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 1609, 191 L.Ed.2d 492 ( Rodriguez ). We affirm the trial court's denial of Vera's suppression motion.
I. FACTS
On June 22, 2017, City of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. GyorgyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- People v. Ochoagomez CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021