Legal Opinion

People v. Vera

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided November 5, 2018No. E069367PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPHAEL J.

*1083Defendant and appellant Esteban Vera was convicted of possessing one kilogram of a controlled substance that was discovered through a dog sniff during a traffic stop of his vehicle. An officer had stopped Vera due to a tinted-window infraction. We must determine whether the dog sniff unconstitutionally prolonged his detention for that traffic stop, requiring *1084suppression of the drugs under Rodriguez v. United States (2015) --- U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 1609, 191 L.Ed.2d 492 ( Rodriguez ). We affirm the trial court's denial of Vera's suppression motion.

I. FACTS

On June 22, 2017, City of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GyorgyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  2. People v. Ochoagomez CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API