Harold G. Weil and Bea Weil, His Wife v. Joe Keshner
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VOGEL, Circuit Judge.
Harold G. Weil and Bea Weil, his wife, plaintiffs-appellants, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, brought this suit against Joe Keshner, defendant-appellee, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover actual and punitive damages claiming they had been defrauded by the defendant in the sale to them of a one-half interest in a bull. It was alleged by the plaintiffs that the defendant represented that the bull was a breeder of fine cattle, in good health and that they relied thereon, but that actually the bull was a reactor to the agglutination test for brucellosis…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. RossiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Dorsey v. MuilenburgSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Gerhart v. Henry Disston & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Byrd Jellison v. Kroger CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
3Cited by1 opinion
- Soo Line Railroad Company v. Fruehauf CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977