Legal Opinion

Harold G. Weil and Bea Weil, His Wife v. Joe Keshner

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 21, 1962No. 16818_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Circuit Judge.

Harold G. Weil and Bea Weil, his wife, plaintiffs-appellants, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, brought this suit against Joe Keshner, defendant-appellee, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover actual and punitive damages claiming they had been defrauded by the defendant in the sale to them of a one-half interest in a bull. It was alleged by the plaintiffs that the defendant represented that the bull was a breeder of fine cattle, in good health and that they relied thereon, but that actually the bull was a reactor to the agglutination test for brucellosis…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. RossiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  3. Dorsey v. MuilenburgSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  4. Gerhart v. Henry Disston & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  5. Byrd Jellison v. Kroger CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Soo Line Railroad Company v. Fruehauf CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API