Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 17, 1987No. 87-259PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EN BANC

UPCHURCH, Chief Judge.

Hubert Reynolds appeals, contending the trial court erred in imposing court costs upon him, an indigent, without notice or opportunity to object. The amount involved was $22.50. No other point has been raised on appeal.

Reynolds was sentenced to twelve years imprisonment, so obviously this is not a matter of great urgency. Twenty dollars of the cost was imposed pursuant to section 960.20, Florida Statutes (1985), and $2.50 pursuant to section 943.25(4).

This court has held that it is error to impose costs under sections 943.25 and 960.20 where the defendant is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Reynolds v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Plyler v. PlylerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Flarity v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Hollis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API