Legal Opinion

Cochrane v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 11, 1932No. Docket No. 60428Published

The compensation in the form of fees received by the petitioner as master in chancery of the Superior Court of Cook County, Illinois, a statutory office, is not includable in gross income subject to the Federal income tax.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID K. COCHRANE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Cochrane v. Commissioner

Docket No. 60428.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

26 B.T.A. 1167; 1932 BTA LEXIS 1181;

October 11, 1932, Promulgated

The compensation in the form of fees received by the petitioner as master in chancery of the Superior Court of Cook County, Illinois, a statutory office, is not includable in gross income subject to the Federal income tax.

E. Barrett Prettyman, Esq., for the petitioner.

C. A. Ray, Esq., for the respondent.

SMITH

OPINION.

SMITH: The only question for our determination in this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cochrane v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API