Legal Opinion

Durant v. People

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1865PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to the Recorder’s Court of Detroit. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Christiancy J.:

Plaintiff in error was tried in the Recorder’s Conrt of the City of Detroit upon a charge of receiving certain *352stolen goods, the property of one Blodgett, knowing the same to have been feloniously stolen, &e.

The prosecution introduced evidence tending to show that the goods had been stolen by her brother,' James Durant, who had been arrested a few days before the arrest of defendant, and imprisoned in the Wayne County jail; that these goods, with a considerable amount of other stolen property, were' found in certain trunks in defendant’s house, no person being at the time in…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kasle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  2. Wertheimer & Goldberg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. People v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. People v. TantenellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. People v. JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API