Durant v. People
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to the Recorder’s Court of Detroit. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Christiancy J.:
Plaintiff in error was tried in the Recorder’s Conrt of the City of Detroit upon a charge of receiving certain *352stolen goods, the property of one Blodgett, knowing the same to have been feloniously stolen, &e.
The prosecution introduced evidence tending to show that the goods had been stolen by her brother,' James Durant, who had been arrested a few days before the arrest of defendant, and imprisoned in the Wayne County jail; that these goods, with a considerable amount of other stolen property, were' found in certain trunks in defendant’s house, no person being at the time in…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Kasle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Wertheimer & Goldberg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
- People v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. TantenellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.