Legal Opinion

Movsesian v. Victoria Versicherung Ag

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 2010No. 07-56722PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

629 F.3d 901 (2010)

Vazken MOVSESIAN; Harry Arzoumanian; Garo Ayaltin; Miran Khagerian; Ara Khajerian, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated including thousands of senior citizens, disabled persons, and orphans as well as on behalf of the general public and acting in the public interest, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

VICTORIA VERSICHERUNG AG, a German corporation; Ergo Versicherungsgruppe AG, a German corporation, Defendants, and

Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft AG, a German corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-56722.

United States Court of Appeals,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Movsesian v. Victoria Versicherung AGCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API