Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Probate of the Will of Coddington

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1954Published

1DissentVan Voorhis, J.

The probate of a will is contested upon the ground that testatrix was mentally incompetent at the time of its execution. Although her attending physician was evidently prepared to testify that she was incompetent to make a will, and to do so on the basis of a diagnosis that she suffered from arteriosclerosis in an advanced stage, his testimony was excluded upon the ground that it would have involved the disclosure of a privileged communication contrary to section 352 of the Civil Practice Act. This ruling was made notwithstanding that there had been a waiver of the privilege to the full *196extent…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. The People Ex Rel. Jackson v. . PotterNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Grattan v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Edington v. . Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Edington v. . Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Renihan v. . DenninNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API