Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Amoco Oil Co. v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1996Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPellegrini, Judge

While I concur with the majority on other issues, I respectfully dissent from the portion of the majority’s opinion holding that the trial court committed reversible error by permitting testimony as to the continued use of the non-condemned portion of the subject property.

Alice Weiss, the owner of property located in the Borough of Emsworth (Borough), leased it to Amoco Oil Company for use as a gasoline station. Under the Borough’s Zoning Ordinance, the property is within a B-2 Business District, which permits gasoline stations. However, the Zoning Ordinance, inter alia, requires a lot width…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Condemnation by the Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API