Legal Opinion

Como Oil Co., Inc. v. O'LOUGHLIN

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 21, 1985No. 64139PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

466 So.2d 1061 (1985)

COMO OIL COMPANY, INC., et al., Petitioners,

v.

Celestine O'LOUGHLIN, Respondent.

No. 64139.

Supreme Court of Florida.

February 21, 1985.

Rehearing Denied May 2, 1985.

Samuel Tyler Hill of Hill, Neale & Riley, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioners.

Roy W. Allman, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.

2Per curiam

This case is before us based upon conflict between O'Loughlin v. Como Oil Co., 434 So.2d 367 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), and several decisions of this Court. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The issue here is whether the trial court properly directed a verdict for the defense on a…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carraway v. RevellSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Mercury Motors Exp., Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. White Const. Co., Inc. v. DupontSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. Ingram v. PettitSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  5. Teare v. Local Union No. 295Supreme Court of Florida · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by33 opinions

  1. First Interstate Dev. Corp. v. AblanedoSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Paterson v. DeebDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Tallahassee Furniture Co., Inc. v. HarrisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Williams v. City of MinneolaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Chrysler Corp. v. WolmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API