Legal Opinion

Township of Richland v. Cliff

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1902No. Docket No. 12Published

Error to Ogemaw; Sharpe, J. Debt by the township of Richland .against William H. Cliff, principal, and Barney Mills and Charles H. Prescott, sureties, on a township treasurer’s bond. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action on a township treasurer’s bond in the penal sum of $4,000. The suit was originally instituted injustice’s court. Plaintiff recovered in both the justice’s court and at the circuit. Defendants bring error. The summons does not appear in the record, but the declaration complains of the defendants “in a plea that they render to the said plaintiff the sum of three hundred dollars, which they owe to and unlawfully detain from the said plaintiff,” — the usual form of commencement of a declaration in debt. 2 Stev. Mich. Prac. p. 515. The declaration then recites the bond, assigns a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bishop v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Durfee v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Montgomery v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Gray v. StaffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API