Legal Opinion

Pino v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 5, 1903Published

On the claimant1 s Motion. The Reporters' statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court:

1Opinion of the CourtHoavry, J.

Plaintiff was awarded judgment on the third count of his amended petition but denied relief on the second. (The first count was given no consideration because of its abandonment.) Thereupon he moved for a new trial, alleging error in dismissing the petition as to the second cause of action and in underestimating the value of the property as to that part of the complaint upon which judgment was awarded. But plaintiff’s motion is met by the counteraction of defendants, who object to any judgment at all, substantially upon the ground that after judgment the court decided in another case that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barron v. BurnsideSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Geilinger v. PhilippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Lowe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1902
  4. De Baca v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API