Legal Opinion

Johnson & Burns, Inc. v. Hayden

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 27, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action to recover for services as architects, brought to and tried by the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County, Molloy, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiff. Error; judgment to be rendered for plaintiff for such damages as the trial court, upon a rehearing confined to that subject, may find the plaintiff has suffered.

1Opinion of the Court

Wheeleb, C. J

The plaintiff sues to recover damages for the breach of its contract with the defendant to design and supervise the building of a house for the defendant, and sets up in the complaint the fact that the defendant had, by the payment of $50, made an accord and satisfaction of the balance due under the contract, but that the same was obtained from the plaintiff through fraudulent representations. The defendant pleaded, practically, a general denial, and in a special defense sets up that plaintiff submitted to him certain rough plans for the house but that he never accepted them or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Barnes v. StarrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  3. Watertown Savings Bank v. MattoonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  4. Coombs v. BeedeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1896
  5. Feltz v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pallardy v. Link's Landing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Southern Land, Timber & Pulp Corp. v. Davis & Floyd Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Epstein v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  4. Southern Land, Timber & Pulp Corp. v. Davis & Floyd Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API